Between Rhetoric and Sophistry: The Puzzling Case of Plato’s Gorgias (2024)

Table of Contents
Acknowledgment References FAQs

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to Chad Jorgenson for his careful correction of the English text.

References

Arends, F. 2007. “Why Socrates Came Too Late for Gorgias’ Epideixis: Plato’s Gorgias as Political Philosophy.” In Gorgias-Menon Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, edited by M. Erler, and L. Brisson, 52–56. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bona, G. 1974. “Λόγος e ἀλήθεια nell Encomio di Elena di Gorgia.” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 102:5–33.Search in Google Scholar

Buchheim, T. 1989. Gorgias von Leontinoi. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 1932. Studi sull’eleatismo. Roma: Tipografia del Senato.Search in Google Scholar

Canto-Sperber, M. 2007. Platon. Gorgias. Paris: GF Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Dalfen, J. 2004. Platon. Gorgias. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

De Romilly, J. 1988. Les grands sophistes dans l’Athènes de Périclès. Paris: Éditions de Fallois.Search in Google Scholar

Desclos, M.-L. 2009. Les Sophistes, I. Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon, Xéniade, Lycophron, Prodicos, L’Anonyme De Jamblique, Critias. Paris: GF Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Diels, H. 1976. “Gorgias und Empedokles.” In Sophistik, edited by C.J. Classen, 351–83. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Diels, H., and W. Kranz. 1951. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Dilman, I. 1979. Morality and the Inner Life. A Study in Plato’s Gorgias. London/Basingstole: Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-04797-0Search in Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato. Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Reprinted 1976. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

duch*emin, J. 1943. “Remarques sur la composition du Gorgias.” Revue des Études Grecques 56:265–86.Search in Google Scholar

Dupréel, E. 1948. Les Sophistes. Protagoras. Gorgias. Prodicus. Hippias. Reprinted 1980. Neuchâtel: Éditions du Griffon.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, L. 2005. “Techne and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias.” Apeiron 38:229–55.10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.4.229Search in Google Scholar

Gomperz, H. 1912. Sophistik und Rhetorik. Das Bildungsideal des ΕΥ ΛΕΓΕΙΝ in seinem Verhältnis zur Philosophie des V. Jahrhunderts, Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. 1991. “Socrates, the Craft Analogy, and Science.” Apeiron 24:1–24.10.1515/APEIRON.1991.24.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Gulick, C. B. 1933. Athenaeus. The Deipnosophists. Vol. 5. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. London: W. Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. The Fifth-Century Elightenment. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. 1964. “Was Gorgias a Sophist?.” Phoenix 18:183–92.10.2307/1086795Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, L. 2017. Die grosse Rede des Timaios – Ein Beispiel wahrer Rhetorik? Zu Theorie und Praxis philosophischer Rhetorik in Platons Dialogen Gorgias, Phaidros und Timaios. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.10.24894/978-3-7965-3667-0Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, K. 1983. Platon. Gorgias. Stuttgart: Reclam.Search in Google Scholar

Irani, T. 2017. Plato on the Value of Philosophy. The Art of Argument in the Gorgias and Phaedrus. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/9781316855621Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1979. Plato. Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198720911.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511585579Search in Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klosko, G. 1984. “The Refutation of Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias’.” Greece & Rome 31:126–39.10.1017/S0017383500028503Search in Google Scholar

Levy, D. 2005. “Techne and the Problem of Socratic Philosophy in the Gorgias.” Apeiron 38:185–227.10.1515/APEIRON.2005.38.4.185Search in Google Scholar

Moravczik, J. 2007. “Goodness Trumps Pleasure-Loving in the Gorgias.” In Gorgias-Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, edited by M. Erler, and L. Brisson, 122–27. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Newiger, H.-J. 1973. Untersuchungen zu Gorgias’ Schrift Über das Nichtseiende. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110834673Search in Google Scholar

Pinjuh, J.-M. 2014. Platons Hippias Minor. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Search in Google Scholar

Renaud, F. 2001. “La rhétorique socratico-platonicienne dans le Gorgias de Platon.” In Philosophie antique. Problèmes, Renaissance, Usages, edited by A. Laks, and M. Narcy, 65–86. Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, 2nd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roochnik, D. L. 1986. “Socrates’s Use of the Techne-Analogy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24:295–310.10.1353/hph.1986.0053Search in Google Scholar

Ross, D. 1974. Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Segal, C. P. 1962. “Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66:99–155.10.2307/310738Search in Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1872. “The Sophists.” The Journal of Philology 4:288–307.Search in Google Scholar

Sprague, R. K. 1972. The Older Sophists. A Complete Translation by Several Hands of the Fragments in Die Fragmente Der Vorsokratiker, Edited by Diels-Kranz. With A New Edition of Antiphon and of Euthydemus. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, B. 1989. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117919.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Von Arnim, H. 1898. Leben und Werke des Dion von Prusa. Mit einer Einleitung: Sophistik, Rhetorik, Philosophie. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Between Rhetoric and Sophistry: The Puzzling Case of Plato’s Gorgias (2024)

FAQs

What is the difference between sophistry and rhetoric? ›

Whereas rhetoric aims to mimic justice, sophistry imitates legislation.

What does Plato say about rhetoric in Gorgias? ›

In the dialogue Gorgias, Plato (through his mentor Socrates) expresses his contempt for sophistical rhetoric; all rhetoric is "a phantom of a branch of statesmanship (463d) ...a kind of flattery ...that is contemptible," because its aim is simply pleasure rather than the welfare of the public.

What is sophistry according to Plato? ›

The philosophical problem of the nature of sophistry is arguably even more formidable. Due in large part to the influence of Plato and Aristotle, the term sophistry has come to signify the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning, intellectual charlatanism and moral unscrupulousness.

What is the main argument of Gorgias? ›

Gorgias begins his argument by presenting a logical contradiction, “if the nonexistent exists, it will both exist and not exist at the same time” (B3. 67) (a violation of the principle of non-contradiction). He then denies that existence (to on) itself exists, for if it exists, it is either eternal or generated.

Why did Plato criticize sophistic rhetoric? ›

Plato criticized the Sophists for various reasons, such as their use of exaggerations and taking money. The sophisticated rhetoricians sought to sway public opinion in their favor, and true justice is founded on the knowledge of the individual and the state.

What is an example of a sophistry? ›

An example of sophistry is the argument that cutting people is a crime, and since doctors cut people open, doctors commit crimes. This is the sophistry of the irrelevant conclusion.

Does Plato see rhetoric as an art? ›

Plato argued in his Gorgias that rhetoric could not be an art (technê), since it is not related to a definite subject, while real arts are defined by their specific subjects, as e.g. medicine or shoemaking are defined by their products (health and shoes).

How does Plato use the allegory as a rhetorical device? ›

Analysis Of Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

In here, Plato uses the writing style of allegory to encompass the use of imagery and symbolism to explain his purpose. He also uses very clever dialogue with constant repetition to represent a bigger idea about the philosophy with chained up people living in a cave of shadows.

What is the difference between poetics and rhetoric? ›

Aristotle separated rhetoric from poetics, treating rhetoric as the art of persuasion and poetics as the art of imitation or representation.

Was Gorgias a Sophist? ›

Gorgias (/ˈɡɔːrdʒiəs/; Greek: Γοργίας; 483–375 BC) was an ancient Greek sophist, pre-Socratic philosopher, and rhetorician who was a native of Leontinoi in Sicily. Along with Protagoras, he forms the first generation of Sophists.

What did the Sophists believe? ›

They believed and taught that "might makes right". They were pragmatists trusting in whatever works to bring about the desired end at whatever the cost. They made a business of their own form of education as developing skills in rhetoric and profited from it.

What was Plato's main arguments? ›

Plato argues that philosopher kings should be the rulers, as all philosophers aim to discover the ideal polis. The 'kallipolis', or the beautiful city, is a just city where political rule depends on knowledge, which philosopher kings possess, and not power.

What is punishment in the Gorgias? ›

In the Gorgias, Socrates argues that just punishment, though painful, benefits the unjust person by removing injustice from her soul.

What are the three propositions of Gorgias? ›

Gorgias proposed absolute nihilism. The three cardinal propositions of this doctrine are the following: (1) Nothing exists; (2) If there were anything, then it could not be known; (3) Even if there were knowledge of being, this knowledge could not be imparted.

What was Gorgias definition of tragedy? ›

In Plutarch's work on Gorgias specifically, an original fragment of Gorgias's writing is preserved. It is said that “tragedy is a deception that leaves the deceived wiser than the non-deceived.” This is exactly the kind of literary style to expect from a sophist.

What best defines the term rhetoric? ›

Rhetoric is speaking or writing that's intended to persuade. If your goal is to write editorial columns for the New York Times, you should work on your rhetoric. Rhetoric comes from the Greek meaning "speaker" and is used for the art of persuasive speaking or writing.

What is sophism in rhetoric? ›

Modern usage. In modern usage, sophism, sophist, and sophistry are used disparagingly. A sophism, or sophistry, is a fallacious argument, especially one used deliberately to deceive. A sophist is a person who reasons with clever but fallacious and deceptive arguments.

Can one employ rhetoric without being a sophist? ›

Aristotle's differentiation suggests that one can employ rhetoric without being a Sophist. Rhetoric, as he conceives it, is a neutral tool or skill that can be used for different purposes. It can be used for ethical and just persuasion when employed by a rhetorician who values the truth and ethical principles.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kareem Mueller DO

Last Updated:

Views: 5542

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (46 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kareem Mueller DO

Birthday: 1997-01-04

Address: Apt. 156 12935 Runolfsdottir Mission, Greenfort, MN 74384-6749

Phone: +16704982844747

Job: Corporate Administration Planner

Hobby: Mountain biking, Jewelry making, Stone skipping, Lacemaking, Knife making, Scrapbooking, Letterboxing

Introduction: My name is Kareem Mueller DO, I am a vivacious, super, thoughtful, excited, handsome, beautiful, combative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.