Definition/Introduction
A medical history typically follows the history of the present illness if obtained by the treating clinician. The medical history can reveal diagnosed medical conditions, past medical conditions, and potential future health risks for the patient. In addition, the medical history aids in forming differential diagnoses.[1]
Acomprehensive history intakeincludes the patient's medical history, past surgical history, family medical history, social history, allergies, and medications.[2]Within graduate education, theorder of obtaining medical history generally follows the format below. However, with clinical experience, the clinician may follow a more colloquial, natural flow tothe clinical intake. Some areas are omitted or expanded depending on the purpose of the medical history and healthcare setting. Some aspects of the medical history are standardized to arrive at an accurate differential diagnosis, leading to optimal patient outcomes.[3]Members of the interprofessional team contribute to each aspect of the medical history intake. Thistopic is intended for students and practicing clinicians who adhere to the medical practices commonly employed in the United States.
Medical and Surgical History
A way to rephrase the question is to inquire about medical conditions diagnosed or medical conditions for which a patient takes medications. If the patient has no previous diagnoses, asking about surgeries is another approach. For example, in the case of a patient who underwent bariatric surgery, the patient is likely diagnosed with hyperlipidemia but does not consider this a medical disease. Alternatively,thepatient might mention taking benzodiazepines, indicating a potential diagnosis of anxiety or major depressive disorder. For women patients, it is essential to inquire about any previous pregnancies, abortions,or miscarriages. Both aspects of the history are crucial for understanding the patient's risk factors, identifying contraindicated medications or treatments, and determining appropriate imaging modalities.
Family History
Inquiring about the biological mother, father, and extended family helps clinicians understand the risk of cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, or endocrine disorders, including coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes. Family clinicians inquire more specifically into the history of myocardial infarctions, cancers, and psychiatric or neurological diseases to assess potential risk factors. For example, missing a genetic predisposition to Huntington's diseaseis considered an inadequate history. Several family history tools that integrate with electronic medical records are available to augment this history intake, some of which have succeeded.[4][5]
Social History
The inclusion of social history in medical management can vary depending on the clinician's values and the scope of their practice.
Substancesor nutrition: Inquiring about substance use in a neutral approach ensures a positive patient-clinician rapport. Some patients may consider substances a part of their approach to nutrition, which can be integrated into a comprehensive social history. Red wine, cannabis, and other legally available substances are a part ofsome diets, treatments for pain relief, or recreational use. Some recent rapid assessments provide a quick picture of nutritional health. When considering a diagnosis affecting appetite, inquiringabout eating habits is pertinent.
Travel history:Recent travel history could make or break a treatment plan for primary care, emergency medicine, or internal medicine clinicians. For example, failing to ask about travel could exclude a diagnosis of meningitis, a life-threatening disease. Similarly, Lyme disease caught at a late stage causes cardiovascular issues, which might be revealed by asking patients about recent hiking activities. Inquiring about geographic regions is essential for some infectious diseases.
Sexual history:Intake variesdue to conflicting values of clinicians about sexual lifestyle and behaviors. Remaining cognizant of gender-diverse, non-traditional sexual relationships is important. The current guidelines in the United States recommend the 5 Ps approach—partners, practices, protection from sexually transmitted infections, history of sexually transmitted infections, and prevention of pregnancy.[6][7][8][9]
Allergies and Medications
Patient allergies are crucial to history gathering, as they may have potentially life-threatening consequences. Inquiring if the patient has any medication allergies and, if they do, clarifyingany previous allergic reactions informs the development of a treatment plan. Medication history is also essentialto mitigate the risk ofdrug-drug interactions.[10]Several electronic medical record systems flag or alert clinicians for these interactions, which could be clarified during the clinical interview.
Specialized History
Reproductive: Depending on the chief complaint, age-appropriate questions about female patients' last menstrual period and pregnancy history, including gravidity and parity, may be asked. Further questions about menarche and menopause may alsobe appropriate. For example, if a sexually active female arrives complaining of lower abdominal pain, reproductive history is essential to rule out ectopic pregnancy. If the same patient is of menopausal age,such questions are inappropriate in this context.
Pediatric:Parents of infants should be asked about pregnancy, delivery, and prematurity complications. In addition, it is crucial to inquire about the immunization status and developmental milestones since pediatricians are the primary clinicians until children reach adulthood. As such, staying attentive to familial relationships helps identify any signs of abuse.
Geriatric: The immunization status of geriatric patients is often relevant. With more vaccination options, including the recently introduced COVID-19 series, this may become a standardized aspect of history-taking. Medication interactions are also common and could be clarified during the clinical interview.
Surgical: In surgical specialties and areas such as dermatology, cardiology, and gastroenterology, the outcome of previous surgeries determines the approach to future surgeries. A detailed history of these previous surgeries is vital for treatment planning, including the anatomical approach.
Issues of Concern
Biases in History-Taking
The following principles, originally derived from the approach to neurocritical patients, are applicable to all history intakes to address biases.
Anchoring: Focusing on one aspect of medical history when new information is available.
Availability: Based on available information, deeminga diagnosis more or less likely.
Premature closure: Narrowing on a diagnosis before completing a thorough workup.
Representativeness restraint: Forcing all history into one pattern of clinical presentation.
Unpacking principle: Focusing on some aspects of workup and omitting others before arriving at a diagnosis.
Context errors: Considering all parts of medical history equally relevant.[11]
The primary goal of obtaining a medical history from the patient is to understand the patient's state of health and determine whether the history is related.[1]The secondary goal is to gather information to prevent potential harm to the patient during treatment. Focusing on these goals in the context of recognized biases and colleague feedback reduces diagnostic errors.
Health Literacy
A key concern is ensuring patients understand questions and can provide accurate histories based on their health literacy. Patientsmay not considertheir illnesses relevant when asked about medical problems, especially in acute treatment settings. Sometimes, a question may be asked in multiple ways using colloquial rather than medical terms. When encountering language barriers, the best practice approach is to use the facility-provided language service but not limit the intake level. Clinicians have approaches to hand-off between nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians so that important aspects of history are communicated.[12][13][14]
Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act
Patients maywithhold information due to fear of judgment or legal consequences. Patients should be reassured that the information is gathered to find the root cause of their illness and treat them most effectively and efficiently. Once obtained, this information must be handled with utmost care to ensure patients' privacy in accordance with laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States. This law prohibits the unauthorized sharing of health information.
Use of Mobile Applications and Artificial Intelligence
The use of mobile applicationsand artificial intelligence–driven programs is at the heart of current discussions regarding workflow. The results of current studies recommend that these tools enhance the workflow rather than substitute the clinician's role for conducting a standardized medical history. If the question set is too large, results demonstrate that the history does not accurately match the defined purpose, such as the patient's chief complaint.[15][16][17]
Clinical Significance
The medical historyis brief or expanded depending on the scope of a medical visit. If a patient presents for an annual wellness visit, the history should encompass all aspects of the patient's history. If the patient has an established relationship with the clinician or is arriving for a procedure such as cyst removal or pap smear, the history does not need to include all standardized aspects. In procedural, surgical, or progress visits, the medical history is more tailored to the visit.
Focused History
A focused history is utilized in urgent care or emergency settings.Instead of extensively analyzingevery detail of the patient's illness history, such as events that may have occurred years ago, the focus is on understanding the immediate context of the visit. This approach includes any changes that have occurred since the last visit and the long-term outlook. This approach is similar to the practice in some primary care visits, where the emphasis is placed on addressing the patient's immediate needs and providing timely care.For example,a patient with a history of breast cancer on chemotherapeutic drugs with a cough versus a healthy patient with no chronic disease. Although the clinician has access to the entire medical history, questions should remain focused on the chief complaint of cough and not delve into cancer management plans.Similarly, if apatient presents with alteredmental status and can no longer provide a history, looking into previous admissions or speaking to the admitting team for relevant information is more appropriate.A detailed historymay not be as relevant as the accident the patient just emerged from or a previous history of stroke. Clinicians tailor the physical examination to address aspects pertinent to the patient's clinical complaint and the focused history. For example, in cases of difficulty breathing and a history of asthma, emphasis is placed on conducting a thorough lung examination, possibly omitting other parts of the physical examination.
Expanded History
Complete medical histories may be obtained after the patient has stabilized or if the patient presents for a visit requiring a thorough history. The family members or caregivers may be a potential source of information about a patient's medical history when the patient is unsure or unable to answer questions. The same patient in cancer treatment could be asked about changes in sleep, appetite, vaccination status, partners, or additional details to tailor a treatment plan, including changes in medication regimen and lifestyle recommendations. In such cases, the treating clinician may continue to discuss different treatment options. Some clinicians may consult with specialists to gain further medical insights and maintain continuity of care. Typically, a review of systems and physical examinations includes all systems.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Although obtaining a detailed history is crucial, it is equally important for clinicians to approach the questioning processwith empathy and consideration for the patient's feelings and condition.[18]Patients may feel rushedor uncomfortable if questions are asked in the same order using the exact words as learned during educational contexts. By adapting the questioning style to accommodate each patient's individual needs and preferences, clinicians can create a more comfortable and engaging environment for communication. This approach not only enhances the quality of information gathered but also enables clinicians to develop their values and skills in patient-centered care.
Furthermore, effective communication of the patient's medical history to other healthcare professionals is essential for ensuring continuity of care and preventing medical errors. Hand-off protocols between healthcare teams serve as crucial checkpoints for transferring patient information accurately and comprehensively. Each healthcare facility has a standardized checklist, which may include reviewing key aspects of the patient's medical history, such as diagnosed conditions, past surgical procedures, and current medication lists.By adhering to these protocols, healthcare professionals can facilitate smooth transitions of care, minimize the risk of oversight or miscommunication, and ultimately promote better patient outcomes.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
Various members of an interprofessional healthcare team, including technicians, nurses, advanced clinicians, physicians, and specialists, play integral roles in gathering different components of a patient's medical history. Aseach interprofessional team member is involved in coordinated care, communication is essential to ensure that the same intakeis not repeated or that crucial pieces of the medical history are missed. Some aspects of the medical history are best obtained at triage, whereas the surgeon or pharmacist may more appropriately address other aspects. Understanding the scope of practice is crucial for conducting clinical intake effectively, leading to the next step in a medical visit.
References
- 1.
Hampton JR, Harrison MJ, Mitchell JR, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Br Med J. 1975 May 31;2(5969):486-9. [PMC free article: PMC1673456] [PubMed: 1148666]
- 2.
Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Von Hales D, Smith NL, Staker LV. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. West J Med. 1992 Feb;156(2):163-5. [PMC free article: PMC1003190] [PubMed: 1536065]
- 3.
Nierenberg RJ. Using the Chief Complaint Driven Medical History: Theoretical Background and Practical Steps for Student Clinicians. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020;9:17. [PMC free article: PMC10734793] [PubMed: 38130354]
- 4.
Miroševič Š, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Peterlin B. Family history tools for primary care: A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):75-86. [PMC free article: PMC9090347] [PubMed: 35510897]
- 5.
Ginsburg GS, Wu RR, Orlando LA. Family health history: underused for actionable risk assessment. Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):596-603. [PMC free article: PMC6822265] [PubMed: 31395442]
- 6.
Pierre EF, Almaroof N. Nutrition History Taking: A Practical Approach. Am Fam Physician. 2022 Oct;106(4):427-438. [PubMed: 36260900]
- 7.
Blakemore S, Hofto ME, Shah N, Gaither SL, Chilukuri P, Tofil NM. Travel Histories in Children: How Well Do Interns and Medical Students Do? South Med J. 2020 Sep;113(9):432-437. [PubMed: 32885262]
- 8.
Brookmeyer KA, Coor A, Kachur RE, Beltran O, Reno HE, Dittus PJ. Sexual History Taking in Clinical Settings: A Narrative Review. Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jun 01;48(6):393-402. [PubMed: 33093285]
- 9.
Savoy M, O'Gurek D, Brown-James A. Sexual Health History: Techniques and Tips. Am Fam Physician. 2020 Mar 01;101(5):286-293. [PubMed: 32109033]
- 10.
Francis M, Deep L, Schneider CR, Moles RJ, Patanwala AE, Do LL, Levy R, Soo G, Burke R, Penm J. Accuracy of best possible medication histories by pharmacy students: an observational study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Apr;45(2):414-420. [PMC free article: PMC9749631] [PubMed: 36515780]
- 11.
Wijdicks EFM. Taking a History in Neurocritically Ill Patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Jun;32(3):677-682. [PubMed: 32346841]
- 12.
Litzau M, Turner J, Pettit K, Morgan Z, Cooper D. Obtaining History with a Language Barrier in the Emergency Department: Perhaps not a Barrier After All. West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):934-937. [PMC free article: PMC6225939] [PubMed: 30429924]
- 13.
Dunne C, Dunsmore AWJ, Power J, Dubrowski A. Emergency Department Presentation of a Patient with Altered Mental Status: A Simulation Case for Training Residents and Clinical Clerks. Cureus. 2018 May 04;10(5):e2578. [PMC free article: PMC6034765] [PubMed: 29984120]
- 14.
Toney-Butler TJ, Unison-Pace WJ. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 28, 2023. Nursing Admission Assessment and Examination. [PubMed: 29630263]
- 15.
Albrink K, Joos C, Schröder D, Müller F, Hummers E, Noack EM. Obtaining patients' medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):189. [PMC free article: PMC9297616] [PubMed: 35854290]
- 16.
Gashi F, Regli SF, May R, Tschopp P, Denecke K. Developing Intelligent Interviewers to Collect the Medical History: Lessons Learned and Guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 07;279:18-25. [PubMed: 33965913]
- 17.
Renggli JF, Eken C, Siegrist V, Ortega RN, Nickel C, Rosin C, Hertwig R, Bingisser R. Usability of a Web-based Software Tool for History Taking in the Emergency Department. Acute Med. 2020;19(3):131-137. [PubMed: 33020756]
- 18.
Ohm F, Vogel D, Sehner S, Wijnen-Meijer M, Harendza S. Details acquired from medical history and patients' experience of empathy--two sides of the same coin. BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 09;13:67. [PMC free article: PMC3661386] [PubMed: 23659369]
Disclosure: Jonathan Nichol declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Joshua Henrina Sundjaja declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Grant Nelson declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
