Reliability of C-reactive Protein as a Biomarker for Cardiovascular and Oral Diseases in Young and Old Subjects (2024)

  • Journal List
  • J Pharm Bioallied Sci
  • v.13(Suppl 2); 2021 Nov
  • PMC8686985

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Reliability of C-reactive Protein as a Biomarker for Cardiovascular and Oral Diseases in Young and Old Subjects (1)

HomeCurrent issueInstructionsSubmit article

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2): S1458–S1461.

Published online 2021 Nov 10. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_251_21

PMCID: PMC8686985

PMID: 35018009

Wagisha Barbi,1 Saurav Kumar,2 Sonal Sinha,3 Mehdi Askari,4 Swati Priya,3 and Shubham J Kumar5

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Background:

Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are associated with various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), periodontal diseases, and other inflammatory diseases and can be an effective biomarker for predicting future risks of periodontal diseases.

Aims:

The present trial was carried out to evaluate if CRP levels are lower in healthy and young individuals as compared to individuals with high body mass index (BMI), gingival index, and CVDs by assessing CRP levels in young and old individuals (more than 45 years).

Materials and Methods:

A total of 174 participants were recruited for the study and were divided into three following groups: Less than 45 years healthy participants (n = 124), more than 45 years healthy participants, and more 45-year-old participants with CVDs (n = 25). The collected data were subjected to the statistical analysis.

Results:

In Group I, females had a CRP level of 8476 ± 6.86 pg, females of Group II had a CRP value of 13,262 ± 3.76, and in females of Group III CRP value was 22,761 ± 6.24 pg. These values, respectively, for males were 8494 ± 7.68, 13,840 ± 4.82, and 13,839 ± 3.8. In smokers, the CRP values for Group I, II, and III were 29,012 ± 14.66, 12,568 ± 4.16, and 16,826 ± 3.42, respectively.

Conclusion:

CRP levels were higher in males as compared to females. Higher BMI was associated with higher values of CRP. The participants with higher BMI presented higher CRP values irrespective of age.

KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular diseases, C-reactive protein, inflammatory diseases, obesity, periodontal diseases

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are emerging as the main cause of death in the world causing approximately 17 million deaths in a year, and the number is expected to increase shortly which accounts for more death than cancers of all types combined.[1] Foam cell formation in CVD leads to elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels which in turn can lead to CVDs. Consistently, elevated levels of CRP in CVDs indicate the presence of inflammation in CVDs. CRP is associated with systemic inflammation and low during normal conditions.[2]

Gingivitis and periodontitis are inflammatory diseases of the supporting tissues of teeth caused by plaque, microorganisms, and calculus and can result in systemic diseases such as diabetes and CVDs. Periodontitis being a chronic inflammatory disease also involves acute inflammatory markers of the immune system such as fibrinogen, CRP, and/or plasminogen activator inhibitors.[3] Gingivitis and periodontitis are also related to the CVDs as a higher incidence of CVDs is found in participants of periodontal diseases. Various indices are used to measure periodontal diseases including gingival index and periodontal index.[4]

Obesity is affecting a large population globally and is one of the major causes of morbidity. Obesity is measured by body mass index (BMI), where a BMI of more than 25 kg/m2 in adults shows obesity. Various diseases caused by obesity include musculoskeletal diseases, respiratory diseases, infertility, dermatological diseases, CVDs, gallbladder diseases, diabetes, and cancers of certain types.[5]

CRP associated with various inflammatory diseases is measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test, which is an antigen-antibody test. The ELISA test is used in two ways using the immunoassay system. Both the assays showed some difference but high accuracy and reliability in detecting the levels of CRP.[6] Various studies in previous literature have established a link between inflammatory periodontal diseases such as gingivitis and periodontitis with high CRP levels. Very scarce data in the literature are available regarding the relation of high CRP and gingivitis with other diseases including CVD and obesity.[7] Hence, the present trial was carried out to evaluate if CRP levels are lower in healthy and young individuals as compared to individuals with high BMI, gingival index, and CVDs by assessing CRP levels in young (<45 years) and old individuals (more than 45 years).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present trial was carried out to evaluate if CRP levels are lower in healthy and young individuals as compared to individuals with high BMI, gingival index, and CVDs by assessing CRP levels in young and old individuals (more than 45 years). The study included three groups as follows: One group with the age <45 years and with no CVDs or other medical diseases, 2nd group having participants higher than 45 years of age with no CVDs or other medical diseases, and 3rd group having participants higher than 45 years with CVD.

The present study collected the plasma specimen from the included participants to assess the CRP levels. The study included both males and females within the age group of 18–78 years with a mean age of 47.6 years. A total of 174 participants were recruited for the study and were divided into three following groups:

Group I: Less than 45 years healthy participants (n = 124)

Group II: More 45 years healthy participants (n = 25)

Group III: More 45 years old participants with CVDs (n = 25)

To be included in the study, the participants had to be of 18 years or more, in a mental and physical sound state, and ready to provide plasma sample. The exclusion criteria for the study were participants with the tumor in the oral cavity, generalized excessive plaque and calculus, caries affecting the large number of teeth, generalized and advanced periodontal disease, mobility and suppuration in gingival areas, and with teeth mobility. Furthermore, participants having systemic diseases other than CVDs, pregnant females, lactating females, and participants with immunosuppression were excluded from the study.

The demographic characteristics of the study participants were recorded followed by an examination of the oral cavity to assess the periodontal status. A thorough examination of the facial symmetry, buccal mucosa, lips, lymph nodes, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, and teeth was carried out. Following examination, gingival index[8] was evaluated. Finally, the CRP levels were assessed from the plasma obtained from 5 ml of whole blood obtained from participants both at baseline and last visit. After this, BMI of all study participants was also calculated using the standardized formula in kg/m2. The collected data were subjected to the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics of the study participants were recorded and are summarized in Table 1. The study included both males and females within the age range of 18 years to 78 years with a mean age of 47.6 years. The study had 83 females (47.70%), and 52.29% males (n = 91). 40.80% study participants were smokers (n = 71) and 59.19% (n = 103) were non-smokers. The mean BMI of the study participants was 29.6 kg/m2.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the study participants

CharacteristicNumber (n=174), n (%)
Mean age47.6
Age range18-78
Sex
 Females83 (47.70)
 Males91 (52.29)
Smoking status
 Positive71 (40.80)
 Negative103 (59.19)
Mean BMI29.6

Open in a separate window

BMI: Body mass index

The present study also assessed the CRP levels in smokers and of different sex. The results are listed in Table 2. The results showed that in Group I, <45 years healthy participants (n = 124) females had a CRP level of 8476 ± 6.86 pg, females of Group II had a CRP value of 13,262 ± 3.76, and in females of Group III CRP value was 22,761 ± 6.24 pg. These values, respectively, for males were 8494 ± 7.68, 13,840 ± 4.82, and 13,839 ± 3.8. In smokers, the CRP values for Group I, II, and III were 29,012 ± 14.66, 12,568 ± 4.16, and 16,826 ± 3.42, respectively. For nonsmokers, the CRP values were 30,124 ± 28.14, 16,826 ± 3.42, and 18,748 ± 26.26 for Groups I, II, and III, respectively.

Table 2

Effect of sex and smoking on C-reactive protein in study subjects

CharacteristicSexSmoking status
FemalesMalesPositiveNegative
CRP (page) for Group I ?45 years healthy participants (n=124)8476±6.868494±7.6829012±14.6630124±28.14
CRP (page) for Group II >45 years healthy participants (n=25)13262±3.7613840±4.8212568±4.1616826±3.42
CRP (in page) for Group III >45 years old participants with CVDs (n=25)22761±6.2413839±3.816826±3.4218748±26.26

Open in a separate window

CRP: C-reactive protein, CVDs: Cardiovascular diseases

On evaluating the gingival index for the three groups, the results showed that for females the values for the gingival index for the three groups were 0.779 ± 0.72, 2.06 ± 0.88, and 2.29 ± 1.1, respectively. The respective values for males in Group I, II, and III were 0.86 ± 0.66, 2.145 ± 0.74, and 2.16 ± 0.92. The CRP values concerning gingival index in three groups, respectively, were found to be 31,492 ± 8.74, 18,926 ± 6.82, and 42,168 ± 7.92. It was seen that the values increased from Group I to Group III for females, males, and CRP. Concerning BMI, the values in females for Group I, II, and III were 25.07 ± 3.24, 23.07 ± 3.78, and 27.02 ± 2.86, respectively. These values for males in three groups were 25.04 ± 4.12, 23.54 ± 3.26, and 30.025 ± 2.78, respectively. BMI values for both males and females were higher for Group I, and then decreased for Group II, and the highest BMI was seen for Group III. The CRP values concerning BMI in three groups, respectively, were found to be 32,168 ± 9.22, 18,954 ± 8.14, and 43,682 ± 9.68. These values showed statistical variation in agreement with the values for gingival index [Table 3].

Table 3

Effect of gingival index and body mass index on C-reactive protein in study groups

CharacteristicGroup I ?45 years healthy subjects (n=124)Group II ? 45 years healthy subjects (n=25)Group III ?45 years old subjects with CVDs (n=25)
Gingival index
 Females0.779±0.722.06±0.882.29±1.1
 Males0.86±0.662.145±0.742.16±0.92
 CRP values31492±8.7418926±6.8242168±7.92
BMI
 Females25.07±3.2423.07±3.7827.02±2.86
 Males25.04±4.1223.54±3.2630.025±2.78
 CRP values32168±9.2218954±8.1443682±9.68

Open in a separate window

CRP: C-reactive protein, BMI: Body mass index, CVDs: Cardiovascular diseases

DISCUSSION

The study results have shown that on evaluating the gingival index for the three groups, the results showed that CRP values in three groups, respectively, were found to be 31,492 ± 8.74, 18,926 ± 6.82, and 42,168 ± 7.92. It was seen that the values increased from Group I to Group III for females, males, and CRP. Concerning BMI, the values in females for Group I, II, and III were 25.07 ± 3.24, 23.07 ± 3.78, and 27.02 ± 2.86, respectively. These values for males in three groups were 25.04 ± 4.12, 23.54 ± 3.26, and 30.025 ± 2.78, respectively. BMI values for both males and females were higher for Group I, and then decreased for Group II, and the highest BMI was seen for Group III. The CRP values concerning BMI in three groups, respectively, were found to be 32,168 ± 9.22, 18,954 ± 8.14, and 43,682 ± 9.68. These values showed statistical variation in agreement with the values for gingival index. These findings were in agreement with the studies of Perio diseases and BMI[9] conducted in 2003 where authors linked gingival diseases to BMI values. The gingival index values were higher in males than females except for Group III having old subjects with CVDs. These values were consistent with the study of LaMonte MJ et al.[10] in 2017 where the authors reported more CRP in older females reaching menopause.

The study evaluated the correlation of CRP levels in males and females. On evaluating it was seen that higher CRP levels were found in males as compared to females. The results showed that in Group I, <45 years healthy participants (n = 124) females had a CRP level of 8476 ± 6.86 pg, females of Group II had a CRP value of 13,262 ± 3.76, and in females of Group III CRP value was 22,761 ± 6.24 pg. These values, respectively, for males were 8494 ± 7.68, 13,840 ± 4.82, and 13,839 ± 3.8. The values were nonsignificant in Group I having healthy young participants. In the older group, values were higher in females. These findings were similar to the findings by Alzalzalah[11] in 2017 where the authors reported results similar to the present study.

The present study also assessed the CRP levels in smokers and of different sex. The results showed that in Group I, <45 years healthy subjects (n = 124) females had a CRP level of 8476 ± 6.86 pg, females of Group II had a CRP value of 13,262 ± 3.76, and in females of Group III CRP value was 22,761 ± 6.24 pg. These values, respectively, for males were 8494 ± 7.68, 13,840 ± 4.82, and 13,839 ± 3.8. In smokers, the CRP values for Group I, II, and III were 29,012 ± 14.66, 12,568 ± 4.16, and 16,826 ± 3.42, respectively. For nonsmokers, the CRP values were 30,124 ± 28.14, 16,826 ± 3.42, and 18,748 ± 26.26 for Group I, II, and III respectively. Low CRP levels were seen in smokers compared to nonsmokers. Furthermore, lower GI values were seen in smokers owing to less bleeding after vasoconstriction as suggested by Bansal et al.[12] in 2014 regarding the CRP values.

CONCLUSION

The present study concludes that CRP detection can act as an important, reliable, and easy biomarker to predict the risk for future CVD. The results regarding age, sex, BMI, and gingival index showed that CRP levels were higher in males compared to females. Higher BMI was associated with higher values of CRP. The participants with higher BMI presented higher CRP values irrespective of age. Similar results were demonstrated for gingival index values where higher index values were associated with high CRP values. Inconclusive results were seen concerning smoking which can be due to the small sample size.

The study had few shortcomings including the geographical area bias, small sample size, and monitoring period. Future studies should focus on conducting studies in different regions with larger sample sizes and monitoring periods to reach a definitive conclusion.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. WHO; CVD Risk Chart Working Group. World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: Revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7:1332–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Shrivastava AK, Singh HV, Raizada A, Singh SK. C-reactive protein, inflammation, and coronary heart disease. Egypt Heart J. 2015;67:89–97. [Google Scholar]

3. Sanz M, Marco Del Castillo A, Jepsen S, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, D’Aiuto F, Bouchard P, et al. Periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases: A consensus report. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:268–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Nazir MA. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2017;11:72–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. De Lorenzo A, Gratteri S, Gualtieri P, Cammarano A, Bertucci P, Di Renzo L. Why primary obesity is a disease? J Transl Med. 2019;17:169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Fakanya WM, Tothill IE. Detection of the inflammation biomarker C-reactive protein in serum samples: Towards an optimal biosensor formula. Biosensors (Basel) 2014;4:340–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Jayaprakash D, Aghanashini S, Vijayendra RR, Chatterjee A, Rosh RM, Bharwani A. Effect of periodontal therapy on C-reactive protein levels in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with gingivitis and chronic periodontitis: A clinical and biochemical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:456–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index, and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38:610–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Dental Practice Management, “Perio disease, BMI linked to heart disease protein marker,” 2003-ISSN: 827-1305 [Google Scholar]

10. LaMonte MJ, Genco RJ, Hovey KM, Wallace RB, Freudenheim JL, Michaud DS, et al. History of periodontitis diagnosis and edentulism as predictors of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and mortality in postmenopausal women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:4518. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Alzalzalah A. Baltimore: University of Maryland; 2017. C-reactive protein as a biomarker of oral health and risk of cardiovascular disease in healthy and CV disease subjects. [Google Scholar]

12. Bansal T, Pandey A, Deepa D, Asthana AK. “C-reactive protein (CRP) and its association with periodontal disease: A brief review.” J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:21–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

Reliability of C-reactive Protein as a Biomarker for Cardiovascular and Oral Diseases in Young and Old Subjects (2024)

FAQs

Is CRP a reliable marker? ›

By way of example, CRP levels with acute bacterial infections will invariably be higher than with chronic autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis. Although there are limitations to what the CRP test can reveal, it is a relatively reliable way to measure inflammation.

Is C-reactive protein reliable? ›

The dichotomized CRP values measured at the GPCs corresponded with the laboratory values in 88% of the cases. Kappa was 65% (p < 0.00001). Using a 20 mm cut-off point, ESR values measured at the GPCs and the laboratory corresponded in 96% of cases (Kappa = 90%, p < 0.00001).

How accurate is C-reactive protein test? ›

Table 3
Sensitivity at a threshold of 10mg/L (CI)Specificity at a threshold of 10mg/L (CI)
DTS23395% (87%-99%)98% (92%-100%)
CRP-W2387% (79%-92%)91% (87%-95%)
bioNexia CRPplus98% (95%-100%)91% (71%-99%)
Feb 4, 2016

Is CRP a good indicator of heart disease? ›

Your level of C-reactive protein can be an indicator of how at risk you are for developing cardiovascular problems. This is because the development of atherosclerosis (laying down of cholesterol inside the blood vessel walls) is associated with inflammation within the vessel walls.

Why is the CRP test done in children? ›

Why Are CRP Tests Done? Doctors may order a CRP test if a child has signs of inflammation or infection. They use CRP tests to follow conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), arthritis, and lupus. CRP tests also can help doctors see how well treatment for inflammation or infection is working.

Is CRP a good indicator? ›

The C-reactive protein (CRP) test measures the level of C-reactive protein in your blood. One study found that testing for CRP levels is a better indicator of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the LDL test. But, a CRP test is not a test for heart disease. It's a test for inflammation in the body.

What are the disadvantages of C-reactive protein? ›

Drawbacks of CRP tests

Measuring CRP levels is not a perfect method for diagnosing RA or determining the effectiveness of treatment. This is because CRP is not specific to RA. Elevated levels of CRP can indicate any infection or a different inflammatory condition.

What is an alarming CRP? ›

Generally, a CRP level of less than 10 mg/L is considered normal. CRP levels between 10 and 100 mg/L indicate mild to moderate inflammation, while levels above 100 mg/L indicate severe inflammation.

What autoimmune disease causes high CRP? ›

A wide variety of inflammatory conditions can cause elevated CRP levels, including :
  • autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), lupus, and certain types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
  • pericarditis, which is inflammation of the lining of the heart.

What is the best test to check for heart problems? ›

"A coronary calcium scan isn't for everyone, but it's the finest way for those who are uncertain about their heart disease risk to make better decisions about treatment and medications," says Michael Blaha, M.D., M.P.H., director of clinical research at the Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease at Johns ...

When should I worry about C-reactive protein? ›

According to the American Heart Association, results of the hs-CRP can be interpreted as follows: You are at low risk of developing cardiovascular disease if your hs-CRP level is lower than 1.0 mg/L. You are at average risk of developing cardiovascular disease if your levels are between 1.0 mg/L and 3.0 mg/L.

Can stress cause high CRP? ›

Several stress-triggered conditions have been linked with systemic inflammation, with previous reports of elevation in plasma levels of the inflammation marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in association with childhood adversity (1), depression (2), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (3).

What is the most appropriate diagnostic test for CRP? ›

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a protein made by the liver. The level of CRP increases when there's inflammation in the body. A simple blood test can check your C-reactive protein level. A high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) test is more sensitive than a standard C-reactive protein test.

Can you have a high CRP but a normal cholesterol level? ›

You cannot predict your CRP level based on your cholesterol levels, and vice versa. For example, someone with a low cholesterol level may still have a high CRP level. And someone with a low CRP level may still have high cholesterol. CRP and LDL-C play independent and additive roles in your heart disease risk.

What health conditions raise CRP? ›

CRP levels can also rise when you have a viral infection. But they don't go as high as during a bacterial infection. Your healthcare provider may also order the test if they think you have an inflammatory condition or an autoimmune disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis.

Are inflammatory markers accurate? ›

Inflammatory marker tests can help doctors feel more confident that they are not missing anything. But they can sometimes sound a false alarm. If results are abnormal, a doctor might need to repeat the test or do more tests to find out what's wrong.

Can CRP be falsely elevated? ›

Certain medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), will falsely decrease CRP levels. Statins, as well, have been known to reduce CRP levels falsely. Recent injury or illness can falsely elevate levels, particularly when using this test for cardiac risk stratification.

Which is more reliable CRP or ESR? ›

For example, fibrinogen (for which ESR is an indirect measure) has a much longer half-life than CRP, making ESR helpful in monitoring chronic inflammatory conditions, whereas CRP is more useful in diagnosis as well as in monitoring responses to therapy in acute inflammatory conditions, such as acute infections.

Is HS CRP reliable? ›

While hs-CRP is a generally reliable marker of systemic inflammation, it is unclear whether CRP plays a role in causing or worsening this systemic inflammation or is only produced in response to it.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Moshe Kshlerin

Last Updated:

Views: 5964

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Moshe Kshlerin

Birthday: 1994-01-25

Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

Phone: +2424755286529

Job: District Education Designer

Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.