This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
California is notorious for having high living expenses, especially for housing, so it is no surprise that a $300,000 homebuying budget won’t get you far in the Golden State.
Researchers at Go Banking Rates, a personal finance website, analyzed how much a $300,000 budget would get prospective home buyers in each state. California wasn’t considered the best place to look for homes with a fixed budget.
Researchers analyzed the typical single-family home prices in each state using the latest Zillow data to determine which states are the most and least cost-effective for those that have a homebuying budget.
In the Golden State, the average cost of a home is $744,023, reseachers found. Experts with the California Association of Realtors found that the median price per square foot is $373.
Those with a budget of $300,000 could only buy 804 square feet.
Researchers found that a $300,000 home budget also wouldn’t go far in the following states:
- Idaho
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- Oregon
- Utah
- Colorado
- Washington
- Massachusetts
- Hawaii
Hawaii was considered to be the state where a $300,000 home budget would give prospective home buyers the least bang for their buck.
However, it’s not all bad news for potential home buyers with a fixed budget. The study considered the following states gave buyers the most value on a fixed homebuying budget.
- West Virginia
- Mississippi
- Arkansas
- Louisiana
- Kentucky
- Oklahoma
- Iowa
- Alabama
- Ohio
- Kansas
Kansas was considered to be the “best” state to purchase a home with a $300,000 budget.
